It is every artist’s desire that works with the
human figure to render it in the most honest way possible. Honesty is the
operative word in that it encompasses all facets in what compels us toward it
and repels us from it.
See
the work of Philip Pearlstein and to a greater extent Lucien Freud to catch my
drift.
If
you ply your trade in the erotic arts a tightrope is often walked between the
truly sensual and the overtly obvious. The key question here is: How do I get
to the edge of the obvious without tumbling into the abyss?
This
writing is not a denunciation of Pornography, as I believe it has value. Porn
fills a very human need certainly in a well-rounded life and a free society. It
is human from all sides of the fence to lust in a purely animal way, and to
forbid it by social contract or fiat usually leads to a negative return of
repression followed almost always by destructive consequences.
So
how does the artist negotiate the journey between these 2 poles? For me if you
believe that the cosmos always has the last word it is treating the human body
as sacred, as the zenith of finitude. This is the great problem for all carbon
based life forms the gradual slide into oblivion, but humans seem to take it to
heart more than most. We deny it and attempt to control it with disastrous
results.
Finitude
is the only thing that we can absolutely embrace with certainty. Entropy is our
archenemy.
When
I was a young man and certainly no stranger to onanistic behavior I was more
attracted to the Polaroid snapshots of naked women in the back of Hustler as
part of a feature called the Beaver Hunt than I was to the offers of perfection
in the general sections of the magazine. These were women I could relate to.
They seemed eminently more human than the totems to excess and gynecology on
the other slick pages.
The
women in the back were replete with maculations: scars, stretch marks, pimples
all things human just like the girls I yearned for in 7th period
study hall…and yet were offering themselves to me the same way as the
airbrushed perfection that I knew deep down did not exist. These were women who
could fulfill all of my fantasies and still give a PTA meeting a good run for
its money. This was the most erotic for me and still is.
When
I photograph a model there is no manipulation of the final image even after
scanning the negatives. I do not remove anything that would render the sitter
in an otherwise untruthful way. It is what it is and in my opinion no amount of
chicanery rewards the viewer with a deeper erotic experience.
Joan
Crawford’s face was very heavily freckled but you could never tell after George
Hurrell retouched the negative. What I try to accomplish is not Hollywood. Let
Hollywood spend its days polishing the surface, us artists have deeper furrows
to plow.

No comments:
Post a Comment